Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, ANISH DAYAL, JJ
HIND SAMRAJYA PARTY – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks judicial review of the election symbols order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner claims illegal discrimination based on unrecognized party status. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. legal requirements for political party recognition discussed. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. petitioner files multiple questions regarding judicial authority and discrimination. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. respondents argue for dismissal based on established judicial precedents. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. court assesses the powers of the election commission to create the symbols order. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 7. court reaffirms the validity and source of the election symbols order. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. court concludes that existing disparities in party recognition are lawful. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. petition ultimately dismissed after detailed examination. (Para 28 , 30) |
JUDGMENT
NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J.
1. This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a political party who allegedly claims to be registered with the respondent no.2 - Election Commission of India, vide Registration Certificate dated 31st October 2018, bearing Registration No.56/187/2018-18PPS-1. The prayers in th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
