SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(SC) 179

K. M. JOSEPH, ANIRUDDHA BOSE, HRISHIKESH ROY, C. T. RAVIKUMAR, AJAY RASTOGI
Anoop Baranwal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Prashant Bhushan, AOR Ms. Alice Raj, Adv. Mr. Rahul Gupta, Adv. Mrs. Neha Rathi, Adv. Ms. Ria Yadav, Adv. Mr. Gopal Shankarnarayanan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ashwani Kumar Dubey, AOR Mr. Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, Adv. Ms. Janhavi Dubey, Adv. Ms. Ishita Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Shivani Vij, Adv. Ms. Aditi Gupta, Adv. Ms. Tricha Chandran, Adv. Mr. Avinash Shukla, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Baliyan, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Adv. Ms. Tanya Srivastava, Adv. Ms. Shivani Vij, Adv. Ms. Ishita Choudhary, Adv. Ms. Trisha Chandran, Adv. Ms. Aditi Gupta, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. R Venkataramani, AGI Mr. Tushar Mehta, SGI Mr. Balbir Singh, A.S.G. Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. Mr. Vinayak Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Ms. Priyanka Das, Adv. Mr. Manan Popli, Adv. Mr. Niranjana Singh, Adv. Mrs. Shraddha Deshmukh, Adv. Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv. Mr. Sumit Teterwal, Adv. Mr. Mayank Pandey, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Ms. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv. Mr. Anandh Venkataramani, Adv. Mrs. Vijayalakshmi Venkataramani, Adv. Mr. Vinayak Mehrotra, Adv. Ms. Mansi Sood, Adv. Mr. Chitvan Singhal, Adv. Ms. Sonali Jain, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Raman Yadav, Adv. Ms. Sneha Kalita, Adv. Mr. Prasenjeet Mohapatra, Adv. Mr. Samarvir Singh, Adv. Mr. Naman Tandon, Adv. Mr. Shyam Gopal, Adv. Mr. Sharat Nambiar, Adv. Mr. Udai Khanna, Adv. Mr. Kanu Aggarwal, Adv. Mr. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv. Mr. Sumit Teterwal, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv. Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR Mr. Amit Sharma, AOR Mr. Dipesh Sinha, Adv. Ms. Pallavi Barua, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Upadhyaya, Adv. Ms. Aparna Singh, Adv. Mr. Kaleeswaram Raj, Adv. Ms. Thulasi K Raj, Adv. Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AOR Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR

JUDGMENT :

K.M. JOSEPH, J.

INDEX

A. THE CASES: THE FOUR WRIT PETITIONS

B. THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE PETITIONERS; SHRI GOPAL SANKARANARAYANAN, LEARNED SENIOR COUNSEL IN WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 1043 OF 2017

C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF SHRI PRASHANT BHUSHAN, LEARNED COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 104 OF 2015

D. SUBMISSIONS BY SHRI JAYA THAKUR, PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 998 OF 2022 16

E. SUBMISSIONS OF SHRI KALEESWARAM RAJ, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE INTERVENOR in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 569 of 2021

F. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE LEARNED ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE UNION OF INDIA

G. SUBMISSIONS OF SHRI TUSHAR MEHTA, LEARNED SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

H. SUBMISSIONS OF SHRI BALBIR SINGH, LEARNED ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL

ANALYSIS

I. ‘THE FRAMING OF INDIA’S CONSTITUTION’ BY B. SHIVARAO

J. THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY DEBATES

K. THE USE OF CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY DEBATES .......................................................................... 49


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top