K. M. JOSEPH, ANIRUDDHA BOSE, HRISHIKESH ROY, C. T. RAVIKUMAR, AJAY RASTOGI
Anoop Baranwal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.M. JOSEPH, J.
| INDEX | |
| A. THE CASES: THE FOUR WRIT PETITIONS | |
| B. THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE PETITIONERS; SHRI GOPAL SANKARANARAYANAN, LEARNED SENIOR COUNSEL IN WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 1043 OF 2017 | |
| C. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF SHRI PRASHANT BHUSHAN, LEARNED COUNSEL ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 104 OF 2015 | |
| D. SUBMISSIONS BY SHRI JAYA THAKUR, PETITIONER IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 998 OF 2022 16 | |
| E. SUBMISSIONS OF SHRI KALEESWARAM RAJ, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE INTERVENOR in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 569 of 2021 | |
| F. SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE LEARNED ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE UNION OF INDIA | |
| G. SUBMISSIONS OF SHRI TUSHAR MEHTA, LEARNED SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA | |
| H. SUBMISSIONS OF SHRI BALBIR SINGH, LEARNED ADDITIONAL SOLICITOR GENERAL | |
| ANALYSIS | |
| I. ‘THE FRAMING OF INDIA’S CONSTITUTION’ BY B. SHIVARAO | |
| J. THE CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY DEBATES | |
| K. THE USE OF CONSTITUENT ASSEMBLY DEBATES .......................................................................... 49 | |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.