Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
ANIL KUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
SUBHASH CHAND CHAWLA ALIAS SUBHASH CHANDER CHAWLA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed under drc act for eviction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. tenant claims landlord has suitable alternatives. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. landlord's eviction petition dismissed. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. landlord asserts bona fide need for premises. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court considers tenant's arguments. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 6. court examines criteria for alternative accommodation. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. significance of location and suitability discussed. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. court reviews evidence and findings. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. finding on alternative accommodations affirmed. (Para 32 , 33) |
| 10. court addresses issues of disclosure and landlord rights. (Para 34 , 36 , 38) |
| 11. eviction order issued for landlord. (Para 40 , 41 , 42) |
JUDGMENT
1. The petitioner/ landlord, Hereinafter ‘landlord filed an eviction petition being RC ARC 5509/2016 entitled ‘Anil Kumar Jain vs. Subhash Chand Chawla’ under Section 14 (1)(e) read with Section 25 (B) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 , Hereinafter ‘DRC Act against the respondent/ tenant, Hereinafter ‘tenant seeking eviction of Shop being No.N- 18, Munshi Lal Building, Connaught Circus, New Delhi-110 001, Hereinafter ‘subject
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
