V.K. Shali, J.

1. These are revision petitions filed by the two petitioners against the rejection of their leave to defend application in Eviction Petition No.E-2/2015 and E-3/2015 in cases titled Narain Kumar & Sons (HUF) v. M/s. Satya Prakash & Sons (Firms) and Narain Kumar & Sons (HUF) v. Yodhraj respectively.

2. The facts in both the cases are almost similar except in the Eviction Petition No.E-2/2015, the shop in question is bearing No.1/1115 while as in E-3/2015 it is bearing No.1/1114, Bara Bazar, Kashmere Gate, Delhi-110006. Therefore, both these revision petitions are being decided by this common judgment.

3. Briefly stated the facts of the case as averred in the Eviction Petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, are that the respondent/landlord is an HUF consisting of Narain Kumar (Karta) and Smt. Uma Kumari and Smt. Sunita Kumari, who are the wife and the daughter-in-law respectively of Karta Narain Kumar. So far as Sushil Kumar and Smt. Sangeeta Mehta are concerned, they are the coparceners of the HUF, being the son and the daughter respectively of the Karta Narain Kumar.

4. The case which has been set up by the HUF is that it is the lan