IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
BABITA CHOPRA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE (GNCT); DELHI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “CrPC”) filed on behalf of Petitioner/Babita Chopra challenging the Order dated 04.06.2024, whereby Ld. MM allowed the Application under Section 156 (3) CrPC and seeking quashing of FIR 197/2024 under Section 467 /471 of the Indian penal code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as “ IPC ”) dated 23.06.2024, P.S. Laxmi Nagar, Delhi, registered consequent thereto.
2. The brief facts of the case are that Late Sh. Narender Kishore Khanna, brother of the Petitioner/Babita Chopra, was married to Smt. Kiran Khanna on 15.02.1976 and a son, namely Nitesh Khanna (Respondent No. 2 herein), was born from the wedlock, on 29.06.1977. Due to matrimonial discord, Late Sh. Narender Kishore Khanna started living separately from his wife and son/Respondent No.2 since 17.12.1994 and thereafter, started residing with his mother and sister. A Divorce Petition bearing HMA No. 186/1995 was filed by him, although the matter was reconciled. Respondent No. 2 again left Late Sh. Narender Kishore Khanna, on 25.03.2003.
3. After hi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.