Back
Tushar Rao Gedela, J
Rajesh Ranjan – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background leading to the challenge of the contempt of courts act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. failure to establish valid constitutional grounds for judicial review. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. presumption of constitutionality and principles of article 14. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. summary dismissal due to lack of substance. (Para 13) |
J U D G E M E N T
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J: (ORAL)
1. Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs:-
“A. A writ in the nature of Mandamus do issue commanding the respondents to rescind/cancel/withdraw the impugned section 20 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 as having been rendered in – effective despite reportable judgment / order dated: 22-07-2024 passed in Civil Appeal nos. of 2024 [arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos. 19647-48 of 20221 S. Tirupathi Rao versus M. Lingamaiah & Ors with Civil Appeal Nos. of 2024 [arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos. 19748-19749 of 2022] as ultra vires to the article 13, 14 and 20 of the Constitution of India ab initio;
B. A writ in the nature of Certiorari do issue commanding the respondents to transmit entire records pertaini
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
