IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SUSHIL KUMAR (MALI) – Respondent
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. The respondent was working as a Mali1gardener with the New Delhi Municipal Council2“NDMC” hereinafter.
2. On 17 August 2016, FIR 156/2016 was registered against the respondent under Sections 354/354A of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code, 1860, in PS Lodhi Colony. Following this, on 26 September 2016, he was suspended. However, the suspension was revoked on 21 December 2017, subject to the outcome of the disciplinary proceedings to be instituted against him.
3. On 3 January 2017, the respondent was convicted by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate of having committed offences under Section 354A read with 294 and 509 of the IPC. The sentence was suspended by the learned Additional Sessions Judge3“ASJ” hereinafter, in appeal, on 18 January 2017.
4. Even while the sentence imposed on the respondent thus stood suspended, a show cause notice was issued to the respondent requiring him to show cause as to why he be not removed from service. He responded to the show cause notice. Thereafter, on 5 September 2018, the respondent was removed from service under Rule 19 of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 19654“CCS (CCA) Rules” herein
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.