HIGH COURT OF GAUHATI
MR. KAUSHIK GOSWAMI, J
Sri Tinku Kro – Appellant
Versus
Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council – Respondent
Based on the provided legal document, the degree obtained by the respondent No. 4 from the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICEI), Ludhiana, is considered valid for the purposes of employment under the relevant government authority. The recognition was granted by the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) and acknowledged as equivalent to a B.E. (Civil) degree for employment purposes, specifically for those enrolled in the course prior to the cutoff date of 31.05.2013 (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) .
Therefore, the degree in question is deemed valid for employment purposes, as it has been formally recognized and considered equivalent by the competent government authority for the relevant period.
Heard Mr. M. Sarani, learned counsel, appearing for the writ petitioners. Also heard Mr. J. Chutia, learned Standing Counsel, KAAC, for the respondent Nos.1 & 2, Mr. J. Payeng, learned counsel, for respondent No. 4, Mr. B. D. Das, learned senior counsel, for respondent No.5, and Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, AICTE, for respondent No.
7.
2] By way of the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are assailing, inter alia, the impugned appointment order dated 06.09.2017 of private respondent Nos. 4 & 5 to the post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) in the office of the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council, Secretariat, Diphu, and for further direction to the respondent Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council (hereinafter referred to as “KAAC”) to hold a fresh interview for the post of Assistant Engineer as per the advertisement dated
17.02.2017.
3] The brief facts of the case are that pursuant to an advertisement dated 17.02.2017 issued by the Joint Secretary, Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council, Department of Personnel (A), KAAC Secretariat, Diphu, for filling up 1 (one) post of Assistant Engineer (AE) in the office of the Karbi Anglong Autonomous Co
Bedanga Talukdar v. Saifudullah Khan
Shifana P.S. v. State of Kerala
Promod Kumar v. U.P. Secondary Education Service
Mukel Saikia v. State of Assam
State of Orissa v. Raj Kishore Nanda
Vijoy Kumar Pandey v. Arvind Kumar Rai
Prem Singh and Ors. V. Haryana State Electricity Board and Ors.
P.M. Latha and Anr. v. State of Kerala and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.