Back
GAUHATI HIGH COURT
, J
Manindra Ch. Paul v. State of Tripura and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the procedural backdrop and initial conflict regarding non-payment of charges. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. formulation and relevance of substantial questions of law involving statutory notice interpretations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. judicial perspective on the necessity and function of s.80 cpc notices. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 4. waiver of notice and its implications for advancing justice. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 5. final determination, reversing lower court's dismissal. (Para 18) |
1. The judgment and decree dated 4-1-1999 passed by the learned District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala in Money Appeal No. 11/1997 confirming the judgment and decree dated 18-7-1996 of the learned Civil Judge, Sr. Division, Court No. 2, West Tripura, Agartala passed in Money Suit No. 46/1993, has been assailed in this Second Appeal.
2. The appellant herein was the plaintiff in Money Suit No. 46/1993 of the Court of the learned Civil Judge, Sr. Division, Court No. 2, West Tripura, Agartala and the respondents were the defendants in the said suit.
3. Facts leading to this appeal are, in a nutshell, that the appellant as plaintiff instituted a Money Suit before the learned trial Court against the respondents
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
