I.A.ANSARI
Sreenivas Basudev – Appellant
Versus
Vineet Kumar Kothari – Respondent
I.A. Ansari, J.
1. Can service of summons on a defendant be regarded as complete if a copy of the plaint is not delivered to him along with the summons? Is a plaintiff bound to submit to the court copies of documents? If so, when is he so bound? Does the court have the power to direct a plaintiff to furnish to a defendant copy of a document? If so, when and under what circumstances such a direction can be given? If a plaintiff does not furnish to a defendant copy of a document despite directions given, in this regard, to the plaintiff by the court, can, while computing the a period of 90 days for filing of written statement, as envisaged under Order VIII, Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, the period during which the copy of the document remained unfurnished to the defendant be excluded? If a plaintiff does not furnish to a defendant copy of a document despite directions given, in this regard, to the plaintiff by a court, can the court insist that it is the duty of the defendant to file written statement within the extended period of 90 days from the date of service of summons? These are some of the intricate questions, which the present writ petition has thrown up for dete
Smt Rani Kusum v. Smt. Kanchan Devi and Ors. 2005 (6) SCC 705
T.N. v. Union of India (2005) 6 SCC 344
Kailash v. Manhku and Ors. (2005) 4 SCC 480
Shreenath and Anr. v. Rajesh and Ors. AIR 1998 SC 1827
Shaikh Salim Haji Abdul Khayumsab v. Kumar and Ors. (2006) 1 SCC 46
Manohar Lal Chopra v. Rai Bahadur Rao Raja Seth Hiralal AIR 1962 SC 527
Padam Sen v. The State of Uttar Pradesh (1961) 1 SCR 884
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.