SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 16

GAUHATI HIGH COURT
S. B. Sinha, J
Udaimanik Jamatia v. State of Tripura
ST 100 (ST / U) / 2002



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Somik Deb
For the Respondents: Mr. D. Sarkar, Mr. R. C. Debnath

Conviction under IPC Sections 364A and 302 was overturned due to lack of direct evidence linking the appellant to the crimes, highlighting the necessity of corroborating evidence in circumstantial cases.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 364A, 302, and 201 - Conviction for kidnapping and murder - Appellant sentenced to life imprisonment for abduction, murder and concealing evidence - Appellant's conviction under Sections 364A and 302 set aside for lack of evidence. (Paras 1, 45)

(B) Criminal Law - Circumstantial Evidence - Prosecution failed to prove involvement in abduction or murder as testimony from key witnesses lacked direct identification of the appellant. (Paras 12, 17, 40, 45)

(C) Evidence Act - Section 27 - Admissibility of confessional statements leading to discovery of fact questioned, due to absence of corroborative evidence such as DNA analysis. (Paras 26, 43)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted for kidnapping and murder, based on circumstantial evidence and a confession leading to the recovery of skeletons. However, witnesses did not directly associate the appellant with the crimes.

Findings of Court:
The court noted insufficient evidence to prove the appellant's involvement in abduction or murder, declaring the conviction under Sections 364A and 302 unsustainable.

Issues: The main issues were whether sufficient evidence linked the appellant to the crimes, and the admissibility of the confession leading to the discovery of remains.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized reliance on direct evidence in criminal cases and noted the lack of solid evidence connecting the appellant to the offences charged. The prosecution's assumptions were deemed insufficient.

Result: Appeal allowed.

Table of Content
1. trial and conviction of udaimanik jamatia (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of abduction and subsequent charges (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. defense arguments challenging evidence credibility (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 20)
4. insufficient evidence against appellant for conviction (Para 40 , 43 , 46)
5. court's final decision and order to release appellant (Para 49 , 50)

1. The present appellant, Udaimanik Jamatia was put on trial along with other three accused, namely Debashis Reang alias Debasingh Reang, Kishore Jamatia and Manichand Jamatia for committing offence under S.364A and S.302 of the I.P.C. read with S.201 of the IPC On completion of the trial, the learned Sessions Judge, South Tripura, Udaipur upon recording the evidence and hearing the learned counsel for the parties ultimately found the appellant guilty for committing offence under all the sections, as stated supra. For commission of offence under S.364A, IPC the appellant was sentenced to suffer R. I. for life and also to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000/-, id to payment of fine, to suffer further SI for six months and for the offence committed under S.302 of the IPC the appellant was sentenced to suffer R. I. for life and also to pay fine of Rs. 2,000/-, id to payment of fine, to suffer further SI for six months and for the offence committed under S.201, IPC he was sentenced to suffer R. I. for seven years and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/-, id to payment of fine to further suffer SI for three months vide his judgment and order dated 20-9-2005 passed in ST 100 (ST / U) / 2002.

2. Being aggrieved by the order of conviction and sentence as stated supra, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, South Tripura, Udaipur the appellant preferred the instant appeal for setting aside the order of conviction and sentence passed therein.

3. Heard Mr. Somik Deb, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. D. Sarkar, learned PP who appeared along with Mr. R. C. Debnath, learned counsel for the State respondents.

4. The case set up by the prosecution is that one Sri Keshab Biswas, PW 1 Lodged an FIR with the Officer - in - charge of the RK Pur PS on 31-1-2000 alleging inter alia, on that date at about 11o'clock while one jeep bearing No. TR 03 2327 was going towards Garjee from Tainani and when it reached Hachupara, the extremists had stopped the aforesaid vehicle and kidnapped four passengers therefrom, namely Hazar Ali Mia, Chandan Das, Sankar Sarma and Indrajit Chakraborty. Out of these four kidnapped persons, Hazar Ali Mia, PW 3 was released by the extremists.

5. Upon receipt of the aforesaid complaint lodged by PW 1, a police case was registered being RK Pur PS Case No. 18/2000 under S.341/365/34 of the IPC against three unknown tribal miscreants. On completion of investigation the police filed charge - sheet against Trinayan Debbarma alias Tia, Kishore Jamatia, Jabbar Ali, Debashis Reang alias Debasing Reang, Malin Debbarma, Birandra Jamatia, Balaram Jamatia and Manichand Jamatia. Thereafter, on getting certain information further investigation was initiated and three persons namely, Padma Jamatia, Udaimanik Jamatia, present appellant herein, and Pushpa Sadhan Jamatia were arrested and ultimately charge - sheet was also filed against them.

6. As the offences involved in the case were triable by the Court of Sessions the case was committed for trial and the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, to whom the case was transferred, framed charges against the accused persons, namely Trinayan Debbarma alias Tia, Kishore Jamatia, Manichand Jamatia, Udaimanik Jamatia and Debashis Reang. At the time of trial, except accused Manichand Jamatia and the present appellant Udaimanik Jamatia, others had absconded. Hence, the trial was proceeded only against these two accused persons.

7. The charges framed by the Trial Court against the accused persons are as follows : -
"Firstly, that on or about the 31st January, 2000 at about 11 a.m. at Hachupara you abducted Chandan Das, Sankar Sharma and Indrajit Chakrabo



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top