Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Aparesh Kumar Singh, C. J., *Arindam Lodh, J.
Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited – Appellant
Versus
Banking Ombudsman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner's request was based on a complaint against the bank ombudsman. (Para 1 , 1 , 4) |
| 2. details regarding the contract and bank guarantee issued for project performance. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. arguments presented by petitioner and respondents outlining their positions on the invocation. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. conclusion dismissing the writ petition due to invalid invocation post-expiry. (Para 11 , 14 , 15 , 18) |
| 5. court's examination of the contract clauses regarding bank guarantee invocation. (Para 12 , 13 , 17) |
1. By means of filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:
i) For issuance of a writ of certiorari and a writ of mandamus and / or any other appropriate writ, order or direction of the like nature to call for the records of the case from the Respondent No.1 - Banking Ombudsman being represented by the Reserved Bank of India pertaining to Complaint No.RBI / CMS / N2022230 05010648 filed by the Petitioner - Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited (HSCL) and after perusing the said records along with the facts and submissions being urged via the present Writ Petition, be pleased to quash / set aside the Order dated 27.12.2
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
