Back
ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GUWAHATI
, J
Punjab National Bank v. Kamal Thengal
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing a complaint for cheque encashment failure. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding bank liability for negligence. (Para 4 , 12) |
| 3. court's finding on negligence leading to compensation. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. legal implications of the negligence ruling. (Para 16) |
| 5. final decision on appeal dismissal. (Para 18) |
1. Heard Mr. A. Parvez, learned Counsel, appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned Counsel, for the respondent No. 1. Mr. N. Baruah, learned Counsel, for the respondent No. 2 remained absent. However, as the matter is taken up for its disposal, the written argument submitted by the Counsel for the respondent No. 2 along with the one of the Counsel present today, are taken into consideration along with the oral argument of the Counsel present today.
2. This is an appeal under S.15 of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986, challenging the judgment passed by the learned District Commission, Golaghat, dated 23.5.2013 in CPC No. 2/2007. The appeal was filed by the United Bank of India through its Regional Office at Jorhat and the Branch Office at Golaghat both impleaded as opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 and the respondent No. 2 in this appeal as opposite
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
