SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Gau) 7474

ASSAM STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GUWAHATI
, J
Punjab National Bank v. Kamal Thengal
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 | CPC No. 02/2007



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. A. Parvez
For the Respondents: Mr. M. Dutta

Banks are liable for negligence in safeguarding customers' cheques, leading to compensation for misappropriated funds.

Headnote:(A) Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Appeal challenging judgment from learned District Commission - Amalgamation of banks - Liability for cheque encashment - Issues of negligence and deficiency in service were found against the appellant bank which failed to secure the custody of the cheque leading to its fraudulently encashed - Complaint allowed, and order to credit amount and compensation issued. (Paras 10, 11, 16)

(B) Banking Regulation Act - Duty of banks for security of customers' valuables - The inherent duty of security breaches leads to liability for banks in case of fraud and misappropriation claims by customers. (Paras 11, 16)

Facts of the case:
The complainant lodged a complaint against the United Bank of India for failing to credit a deposited cheque amounting to Rs. 1,60,000 into his account, which was later fraudulently encashed at another bank. The appellant bank was accused of negligence leading to the failure to secure the cheque.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the appellant bank was negligent and liable for the misappropriation of funds, directing reimbursement and compensation to the complainant.

Issues: Whether the learned Commission correctly held the banks liable for negligence and deficiency of service?

Ratio Decidendi: Failure to adhere to banking duties concerning the custody of cheques results in liability; both the collecting bank and drawee bank have responsibilities as per the provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

Result: The appeal is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. filing a complaint for cheque encashment failure. (Para 2 , 3)
2. arguments regarding bank liability for negligence. (Para 4 , 12)
3. court's finding on negligence leading to compensation. (Para 10 , 11)
4. legal implications of the negligence ruling. (Para 16)
5. final decision on appeal dismissal. (Para 18)

1. Heard Mr. A. Parvez, learned Counsel, appearing for the appellant. Also heard Mr. M. Dutta, learned Counsel, for the respondent No. 1. Mr. N. Baruah, learned Counsel, for the respondent No. 2 remained absent. However, as the matter is taken up for its disposal, the written argument submitted by the Counsel for the respondent No. 2 along with the one of the Counsel present today, are taken into consideration along with the oral argument of the Counsel present today.

2. This is an appeal under S.15 of the Consumer Protection Act , 1986, challenging the judgment passed by the learned District Commission, Golaghat, dated 23.5.2013 in CPC No. 2/2007. The appeal was filed by the United Bank of India through its Regional Office at Jorhat and the Branch Office at Golaghat both impleaded as opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 and the respondent No. 2 in this appeal as opposite party No. 3 in the said CPC No. 02/2007 filed by the present respondent No. 1 as the complainant, seeking for a direction to the opposite party No. 1 to credit the amount of Rs. 1,60,000 to the Savings Bank Account No. 13741 of the complainant and compensation of Rs. 50,000 from the opposite party Nos. 1, 2 and 3, jointly or severally and any other reliefs. Subsequently, vide order dated 10.2.2022 passed by this Commission, the appellant United Bank of India was substituted by the Punjab National Bank on the ground that the United Bank of India was amalgamated to the Punjab National Bank.

3. The respondent No. 1 / complainant filed the said complaint on the ground that he deposited fo the appellant bank one A/C payee cheque No. 000924 amounting to Rs. 1,60,000 vide deposit slip dated 19.9.2006 for collection of the said A/C payee cheque from Indian Bank, Golaghat branch, the respondent No. 2. The said amount was supposed to be credited to the S/B Account No. 13741 standing in the name of the respondent No. 1 / complainant in the United Bank of India, Golaghat branch after collecting the same from the Indian Bank, Golaghat branch. The respondent No. 1 had no account in the said Indian Bank, Golaghat branch. On 22.9.2006, he come to know that the cheque amount was not credited to his S/B Account and on enquiry it was informed by the officials of United Bank of India, Golaghat branch that the cheque which was presented for collection of the amount was encashed by someone personally from Indian Bank, Golaghat branch, respondent No. 2 and withdrawn the amount in cash. Thereafter, the respondent No. 1 / complainant approached the Branch Manager who advised the complainant to submit formal written complaint which was submitted on 23.9.2006 to the Branch Manager, United Bank of India, Golaghat Branch along with a copy of the counter foil of deposit slip. In the written complaint the complainant demanded credit of the cheque amount to S/B Account No. 13741. On the same day, an FIR was lodged whereafter Golaghat P.S. Case No. 454/06 under S.409 IPC, corresponding to GR Case No. 979/06 was registered, but no enquiry was carried out by the said police and recover the said amount. On the other hand, no action was initiated by the bank in order to credit the amount to the S/B Account of the complainant. Advocate Notice dated 23.11.2006 was sent by registered post to United Bank of India with a copy to Indian Bank, Golaghat Branch which were duly received by the addressees. As there was no reply as to the notice dated 23.11.2006, the respondent No. 1 / complainant accordingly filed the said complaint registered as CPC No. 02/2007, alleging involvement of the officials of United Bank of India, Golaghat Branch, in the conspiracy with the officials of Indian Bank, Go
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top