TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Arindam Lodh, J
Namita Paul – Appellant
Versus
Food Corporation of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. successful contract completion supported by no demand certificates. (Para 2 , 10) |
| 2. dispute over alleged losses from negligence in contract execution. (Para 6 , 7 , 11) |
| 3. set off rights require evidence of negligence or loss establishment. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. court's order to refund security deposits and ensure proper process. (Para 24 , 25) |
1. Since common questions of law and facts are involved, all the writ petitions are taken up together for disposal by this common judgment on the consent of learned counsels appearing for the parties.
2. The facts, in a nut shell, as enumerated in WP(C) No. 686 of 2023, being taken as lead case, are set out separately here - in - below for convenience:
WP(C) No.686 of 2023:
The petitioner being a Government Contractor and Supplier for the last 20 years has been executing various transportation contracts successfully for carrying food grains / allied materials within and outside the State of Tripura under the Food Corporation of India, the respondents herein. In response to a Notice Inviting Tender, issued by the respondents - FCI she was awarded transport contract for two years for loading / unloading and handling contract at F

Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.