Back
TRIPURA HIGH COURT
Name, J
Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited (HSCL) – Appellant
Versus
Banking Ombudsman being represented by the Reserve Bank of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks quashing of banking ombudsman’s order. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. complaint procedure followed before the ombudsman. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments presented by counsels on both sides. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. explaining terms of the bank guarantee. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. court dismisses the writ petition. (Para 17 , 18) |
1. By means of filing the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:
i) For issuance of a writ of certiorari and a writ of mandamus and / or any other appropriate writ, order or direction of the like nature to call for the records of the case from the Respondent No.1 - Banking Ombudsman being represented by the Reserved Bank of India pertaining to Complaint No.RBI / CMS / N2022230 05010648 filed by the Petitioner - Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited (HSCL) and after perusing the said records along with the facts and submissions being urged via the present Writ Petition, be pleased to quash / set aside the Order dated 27.12.2022 passed by the Respondent No.1 - Banking Ombudsman being represented by the Reserve Bank of India in Complaint No.RBI / CMS / N202223005010648 having been passed by the Respondent No.1 - Banking Om
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
