IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S. V. Pinto, J
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Bhimabhai Chakubhai Chauhan – Respondent
MODIFICATION OF JUDGMENT
Modification of Judgment dtd. 27/03/2026 in R/CR.A/569/2010 ORDER DATED: 20/04/2026
ORAL ORDER
Perused the note for speaking to minutes; the same is allowed.
In the judgment dated 27-03-2026, in paragraph 1 (6th line) and paragraph 12 (4th line), the Special (ACB) Case number shall be read as “Special (ACB) Case No. 18 of 1995” instead of “Special (ACB) Case No. 08 of 2004”, and the date of judgment and order shall be read as “29-01-2010” instead of “27-09-2012”.
Further, on the first page, in paragraph 1 (8th line), the provisions shall be read as “Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act” instead of “Sections 7 and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act”.
The rest of the judgment shall remain unaltered. Fresh writ be issued accordingly.
Sd/-
(S. V. PINTO,J)
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 27/03/2026
| Approved for Reporting | Yes | No |
| ✓ |
1] This appeal has been filed by the appellant – State under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 27-09-2012 passed by the learned Special (ACB) Judge & 7th (Ad-hoc) Additional Sessions Judge, Surat (herein after referred to as ‘the l
P Somaraju Versus State of Andhra Pradesh
Chandrappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka
Mallappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka
Ballu @ Balram @ Balmukund & Anr. vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh
Babu Sahebagouda Rudragoudar and Ors. Vs. State of Karnataka
Constable 907 Surendra Singh & Anr. vs. State of Uttarakhand
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.