IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No.321 of 2015

Reserved on: 07.10.2025

Date of Decision: 01.12.2025

Rajinder Singh ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh ....Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹ Yes

For the Petitioner : Mr. Tek Chand Sharma,

Advocate.

For the Respondent/ : M r. Tarun Pathak, Deputy

State Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The present revision is directed against the

judgment dated 01.07.2015 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Shimla ( learned Appellate Court) vide which judgment of conviction dated 30.11.2013 and order of sentence dated 27.03.2014 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chopal, District Shimla, H.P. (learned Trial Court) were upheld. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to

1. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present revision are that the police filed a challan against the accused for committing the offences punishfable under Sections 409 and 477-A of the Indian Penal