IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA

Cr. Revision No.118 of 2013

Reserved on: 04.11.2025

Date of Decision:04.12.2025

Girja Nand Verma ....Petitioner

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh ....Respondent

Coram

Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?¹No.

For the Petitioner : Mr Lovneesh Kanwar, Senior

Advocate with M/s Tek Chand

and Tarun Garla, Advocate.

For the Respondent/ : Mr Prashant Sen, Deputy

State Advocate General.

Rakesh Kainthla, Judge

The present revision is directed against the

judgment of conviction dated 12.04.2013 and order of sentence dated 16.04.2013 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Shimla (learned Appellate Court) vide which the judgment dated 18.12.2008 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First

1. Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes

Class, Court No.1, Shimla, District Shimla (learned Trial Court) was set aside. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the. learned Trial Court for convenience.)

2. Briefly stated, the factsf leading to the present revision are that the police filed a challan against the accused for committing the offences punishable un