SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(HP) 500

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Vivek Singh Thakur, Romesh Verma, JJ.
Dikken Kumar Thakur & Anr. - Petitioners
Versus
The State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. - Respondents
CWPIL No.115 of 2025
Decided On : 09-01-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Ankush Dass Sood, Senior Advocatewith Mr. Nand Lal Thakur, Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Mr. Ajay Dhiman, Mr. Khem Raj, Mr. Kiran Kumar, Mr. Ajay Sipahiya, Mr. Tarun Mehta, Mr. Udit Shaurya Kaushik, Mr. Aditya Kaushal, Mr. Vishal Verma, Mr. Vinod Kumar and Mr. Sanjeev Pathania, Advocates.
For the Respondent:Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Tejasvi Dogra and Mr. Mohit Sharma, Advocates, Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Swati Draik, Deputy Advocate General and Mr. Shalabh Thakur, Assistant Advocate General, Mr. Surinder Sharma, Advocate

Article 243E mandates elections to Panchayati Raj Institutions before five-year term expiry; Disaster Management Act orders cannot override this constitutional duty absent proven exceptional circumstances, requiring state cooperation with Election Commission.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 243E, 243K, 243ZA - Panchayati Raj Institutions - Duration of Panchayats - Mandatory to complete elections before expiry of five-year term as per Article 243E(3)(a) - Exception for reconstitution within six months post-dissolution - State Election Commission has superintendence, direction and control over elections - Statutory order under Disaster Management Act, 2005 postponing elections due to calamities cannot override constitutional mandate - Administrative delays in delimitation, reservation roster not justification for deferral - Directions issued to complete processes by 28.02.2026 and elections by 30.04.2026. (Paras 54-72)

(B) Disaster Management Act, 2005 - Sections 24, 72 - Powers of State Executive Committee - Limited to disaster response; cannot supersede constitutional election machinery - No material justifying continued impact of calamities on elections - Executive must cooperate with Election Commission. (Paras 58-60)

(C) Panchayati Raj Act - Sections 120, 128, 140 - Deemed dissolution on term expiry - Administrator appointment permissible only for up to six months pending reconstitution - No right to routinely defer elections post-expiry. (Paras 54-57)

Facts of the case:
Public interest petition seeking mandamus for conducting elections to Panchayati Raj Institutions before expiry of five-year term on 31.01.2026. Delays attributed to delimitation, reservation, court orders quashing certain notifications, monsoon calamities, and order postponing elections until road restoration. State Election Commission ready with electoral rolls and materials, but state officials obstructed process.

Findings of Court:
State Election Commission, Panchayati Raj and Urban Development Departments, and disaster authority directed to coordinate and complete delimitation/reservation by 28.02.2026; elections within eight weeks thereafter, by 30.04.2026. Existing processes to proceed without fresh delimitation where possible.

Issues: Whether elections mandatory before term expiry despite calamities and administrative delays; validity of postponement order under Disaster Management Act; interplay between constitutional election mandate and statutory disaster powers.

Ratio Decidendi: Constitutional provisions prevail over statutes; election process under superintendence of State Election Commission mandatory before term expiry unless exceptional circumstances proven - delays from unilateral executive actions, minor pending delimitations not exceptional; harmonious coordination required among state organs.

Result: Petition disposed of with time-bound directions for elections.

Table of Content
1. mandamus sought for pri elections pre-term expiry (Para 3 , 19)
2. pri terms expire 31.01.2026; delimitation completed (Para 4)
3. delimitation timelines extended, reservations delayed (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. sdma order postpones elections citing disasters (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. art 243e mandates five-year pri duration (Para 18)
6. sc enforces timely local elections despite calamities (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
7. dm act overrides for disaster management (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
8. sec needs 100-160 days post-delimitation for elections (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42)
9. state obstructs sec despite post-disaster normalcy (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47)
10. prior delimitations valid; pr act deems dissolution on expiry (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56)
11. constitution prevails over dm act for elections (Para 57 , 58 , 59 , 60)
12. state delays unjustified; harmonious coordination needed (Para 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68)
13. elections by 30.04.2026 under sec superintendence (Para 69 , 70 , 71 , 72)
JUDGMENT :

Vivek Singh Thakur, J.

Petitioners have approached this Court in public interest for issuance of directions to the respondents to conduct elections and complete the election process before expiry of term of Panchayati Raj Institutions in the State of Himachal Pradesh, as provided under Article 243E of the Constitution of India, seeking the following substantive reliefs: -

“1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Respondents to ensure that the elections to the Panchayati Raj Institutions in the State of Himachal Pradesh are conducted before the expiry of their five-year term, as mandated under Article 243-E of the Constitution of India; and/or

2. Direct the State Election Commission to forthwith notify the election schedule and take all consequential steps for holding free and fair elections to the Panchayati Raj Institutions without further delay; and/or

3. Declare that any attempt to continue the existing Panchayati Raj Institutions beyond their term of five years is unconstitutional and void ab initio; and/or”

2. Vide Notification dated 17.11.2025 (Annexure R-2/12) by By invoking powers conferred under Article 243K(1) and 243ZA(1) of the Constitution of India, Section 161 of the Himachal Pradesh Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 (in short ‘PR Act’), Section 281(1) the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Act, 1994 (in short ‘MC Act’), Section 9(1) of the Himachal Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 (in short ‘Corporation Act’) read with first proviso of Clause 2.1 of the Himachal Pradesh Panchayats and Municipalities Model Code of Conduct, 2020, Clause 12.1 of Model Code of Conduct, 2020, was enforced with immediate effect throughout the State of Himachal Pradesh by State Election Commission which reads as under:-

“12.1 The structure, classification or area of the Panchayats and Municipalities shall not be altered after the issue of Notification by the State Election Commission enforcing this clause, till the election process is over.”

3. It is undisputed that terms of Panchayati Raj Institutions in Himachal Pradesh are going to expire on 31.01.2026, as also evident from Notification dated 17.11.2025 (Annexure R-2/12). It has been further notified in this notification that delimitation of Panchayati Raj Institutions in respect of 3577 Gram Panchayats, 90 Panchayat Samitis, 11 Zila Parishads and 71 Urban Local Bodies, has been completed and stands finally notified with further declaration that electoral rolls of 3548 Gram Panchayats and 70 Urban Local Bodies (‘ULBs’) have been finally prepared after following due process of law and, electoral rolls of 29 Gram Panchayats and one ULB is scheduled to be finalized on 01.12.2025 and 07.12.2025, respectively.

4. It has been further notified that term of 50 Urban Local Bodies, 4 Municipal Corporations (Dharamshala, Palampur, Mandi & Solan) and 5 Nagar P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top