SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(HP) 3187

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA


CWPOA No.5489 of 2019


Reserved on: 20.05.2026

Decided on: 02.06.2026

Uploaded on: 02.06.2026


Usha Devi and others ...Petitioners

Versus

State of Himachal Pradesh and others ...Respondents


Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge


Whether approved for reporting?1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?


For the petitioners: Mr. Chandranarayana Singh, Advocate.

For the respondents: Mr. Sumit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent Nos.1 to 3-State.

Mr. Sanjeev Bhushan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate, for respondent Nos.4 to 19.

Petitioner Advocates:Chander Narayan Singh ,Respondent Advocate: AG Rakesh Chauhan Rajesh Kumar

Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge

1. The petitioners by way of present petition have prayed for the following substantive reliefs:

i) That the letters/orders dated 12.9.2018, 9.6.2018 and 1.10.2018 Annexure A-13 (Colly) be quashed and set aside for all intents and purposes.

ii) That issue appropriate directions to the respondents/Competent Authorities to fix the pay scales for the post of Civil Nazir in respondent No.3 similar to the pay scales of Civil Nazir as has been fixed in the Himachal Pradesh Subordinate Courts/Judiciary.

iii) Issue appropriate directions to the respondents to carry necessary amendment in the R & P Rules, provide promotion avenues to the applicants/Civil Nazir’s as are available to their counterparts in the Himachal Pradesh Subordinate Courts/Judiciary with retrospective effect with all consequential benefits within a time bound manner.

iv) That the respondents may be directed to accordingly work out the arrears of pay in favour of the applicants and pay the same to the applicants alongwith 9% p.a.

v) That the pay of the applicants accordingly be fixed with all consequential benefits.

2. The facts as emerge from the pleadings are that the petitioners were appointed to the post of Civil Nazir, on contract basis with respondent No.3-Commission. Petitioner Nos.1 to 5 were appointed as Civil Nazir, on contract basis, vide office order(s) dated 16.12.2008 (Annexure A-1), 03.07.2009 (Annexures A-2 to A-4) and 30.09.2010 (Annexure A-6), respectively. Petitioner Nos. 1 to 4 were appointed on fixed contractual amount of Rs.7500/- per month and petitioner No.5 was appointed on consolidated fixed contractual amount @Rs.14,100/- per month, which was in the pay scale of Rs.10300-34800+3800 Grade Pay.

3. Later on, services of the petitioner Nos.1 to 4 were regularized vide office order dated 27.05.2015 (Annexure A-5). As per office order dated 27.04.2016 (Annexure A-7), the services of petitioner No.5 were regularized after completion of 5 years of continuous service as on 31.03.2016 in the pay scale of Rs.10300-34800+3200/- Grade Pay, in Pay Band-3 with initial start of Rs.13,500/- per month (Rs.10300+3200 Grade Pay) plus allowances at the rates admissible subject to the condition laid down in the rules and orders governing the grant of such allowances in force from time to time.

4. At the time of offering appointment to petitioner No.5 as Civil Nazir, on contract basis, vide office order dated 30.09.2010 (Annexure A-6), the Rules called as the “Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Civil Nazir, Class-III (Non-Gazetted), Recruitment and Promotion Rules, 2010” (hereinafter to be referred as “R & P Rules”) notified on 14.05.2010 for the post of Civil Nazir, were in vogue. As per these Rules, the pay scale of Rs.10300-34800+3800 Grade Pay was fixed for the post of Civil Nazir.

5. After issuance of the aforesaid Notification dated 14.05.2010, another Notification was issued on 09.12.2011 (Annexure R-3) amending the said Notification. By way of the amendment, the existing provision against Column No.4 relating to the pay scale for the post of Civil Nazir, which had earlier been prescribed as Rs.10300-34800+3800 Grade Pay was substituted with Rs.10300-34800+3200 Grade Pay. Furthermore, the emoluments payable to contractual employees were prescribed in accordance with the details provided in Column 15A. Thereafter, Notification dated 27.09.2012 (Annexure A-9) was also issued by the State Government when the pay band and Grade Pay of various categories of posts were increased after completion of 2 years’ service.

6. Thereafter this Court in exercise of powers conferred under Article 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 4 of the Himachal Pradesh Subordinate Courts Employees (Pay Allowances and other condition of Service) Act, 2005 and Section 18 of the HP Court’s Act, 1976 and all other powers enabling thereto, with the prior approval of H.E. the Governor of Himachal Pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top