Back
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Sujit Narayan Prasad, Rajesh Kumar, JJ
Soumendu Ray – Appellant
Versus
Manasi Ray – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. submission to court and acceptance of documents (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. overview of maintenance orders and arrears (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. non-compliance with maintenance requirements (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. employer's responsibility in maintenance payment (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. assessment of permanent alimony and child dependence (Para 12) |
| 6. need for financial transparency in maintenance cases (Para 14 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. next hearing scheduled (Para 20) |
CORAM :HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ------
For the Appellant : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Thakur, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. D.K. Chakraverty, Advocate --------
Order No. 11 : Dated 26th June, 2025
1. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Thakur, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that in pursuance to order dated 11th June, 2025, the affidavit is ready to be filed, after serving copy upon learned counsel for the respondent, but could not be filed. Therefore, prayer has been made to accept the affidavit.
2. Consider the submission advanced by learned counsel for the appellant, the affidavit is accepted to be taken on record.
3. We have perused the affidavit dated 26.06.2025 filed on behalf of appellant.
4. In the affid
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
