SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(J&K) 12

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND LADAKH
ALOK ARADHE, J
Government of J. and K. v. M/s. Hindustan Construction Company Ltd and Others
Arb. A. No. S-13 of 2016



Arbitration awards may be set aside if contrary to public policy or fundamental legal principles, emphasizing the importance of adhering to contractual terms regarding extensions and compensations.

Headnote:(A) Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1997 - Section 37 - Validity of order rejecting application under S.34 for setting aside arbitral award modified regarding interest - Trial Court's impugned order relates to contract for construction of roadway, where dispute involved compensable delays and entitlement to additional costs. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Arbitration - Interpretation of supplementary agreement as extension versus novation of contract - The parties' intentions and adherence to contractual terms underlie entitlement to compensation for delays not attributable to the claimant. (Paras 12-16)

Facts of the case:
The claimant entered into a contract for roadway construction with an agreed completion within 36 months. Delays due to compensation events led to disputes over additional costs, and the claimant sought extended time and compensatory amounts based on the original and supplementary agreements.

Findings of Court:
The trial court recalibrated the award concerning the interest rate post-award and elaborated on the criteria for extension and compensation within the contractual framework. Issuing clear orders on future proceedings is mandated.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the original contract remained in effect; hence the determination of compensation must consider the defined contractual obligations and judicial precedents. Mistakes in initial judgments affecting contractual interpretations necessitate reconsideration.

Result: The appeal was disposed of with directions for the trial court to address the objections anew.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the arbitration case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. appellant's objections to the tribunal's award. (Para 6 , 9)
3. court's observations on the arbitration process. (Para 7 , 8 , 10)
4. court's analysis on legal and contractual obligations. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 15)
5. conclusion to remand the case for fresh decision. (Para 18)

1. In this appeal preferred under S.37 of the Jammu and Kashmir Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1997 (herein - after referred to as 'the Act'), the appellant has assailed the validity of order dated 2-4-2016 passed by the trial Court by which the application preferred by the appellant under S.34 of the Act has been rejected and the award passed by the Arbitral Tribunal dated 28-12-2014 has been modified insofar as it pertains to grant of interest for the post award period to 6%. In order to appreciate the appellant's challenge to the impugned award, few facts need mention which are stated infra:

2. The appellant issued Notice Inviting Tenders (NIT) on 15-3-2005 by which Tenders were invited for grant of contract for construction of Mughal Road from Bafliaz, District Poonch to Shopian (Pulwama) in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The last date of submission of bid was 14-6-2015. The respondent submitted his bid in response to the aforesaid Notice Inviting Tenders (NIT), which was accepted and letter of acceptance was issued on 14-9-2005. Thereafter an agreement dated 8-2-2006 was executed. Under the agreement, the date of commencement of the work in question was 1-3-2006 and the contract was to be executed within a period of three years i.e. upto 28-2-2009. The total contract price as per the original agreement was Rs. 214,40,00,000/-. The relevant extract of general conditions of the contract are reproduced below :

"2. The Intended Completion Date for the whole of the works is 3 years after the start of work." (Cl. 1-1-17 and 27)

"Clause 3.1 of Part I - GCC. "The language of contract and the law governing the Contract are stated in Contract Data.""

"Clause 8(a) of Contract Data reads as "the law which applies to the Contract is the law of Union of India (Cl.3.1).""

"Clause 11 Employer's Risks.

11.1 The Employer is responsible for the excepted risks, which are (a) insofar as they directly affect the execution of the works in the Employer's country the risks of war invasion act of foreign enemies, rebellion, revolution, insurrection or military or usurped power civil war riot commotion or disorder (unless restricted to the Contractor's employees) natural calamities and contamination from any nuclear fuel or nuclear waste or radioactive toxic explosive or (b) a cause due solely to the design of the Works other than the Contractor's design."

"Clause 17. The works to be completed by the Intended Completion Date.

17.1 The Contractor may commence execution of the works on the start date and shall carry out the works in accordance with the programme submitted by the Contractor as updated with the approval of the Engineer and complete them by the Intended Completion Date."

"Clause 21. Possession of the site.

21.1 The Employer shall give complete possession of the site to the contractor fifteen days in advance of the construction programme."

"Clause 27. Extension of the Intended completion date.

27.1 The Engineer shall extend the intended completion date if a compensation event occurs or a variation is issued which makes it impossible for completion to be achieved by the intended completion date without the contractor taking steps to accelerate the remaining works which would cause the contractor to incur additional cost."

"Clause 40. Compensation Events.

40.1 The following shall be compensation events unless they are caused by the contractor:

a) The Engineer orders a delay or delays exceeding a total of 30 days.

b) The effects on the contractor of any of the Employer's Risks.

40.2 If a compensation event would prevent works being completed before the Intended completion date the Intended compl




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top