Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Sreenivas Harish Kumar, J
Accused No.26 – Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's alleged involvement in harboring accused. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by the appellant's counsel. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. prosecution's response to the appellant's arguments. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 4. court's assessment of prima facie evidence. (Para 12 , 16 , 22) |
| 5. final decision and reasoning for denying bail. (Para 17 , 21) |
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR)
2. The allegation leveled against the appellant is that he harbored accused Nos. 4 and 20 and provided other help to them. They are two of the accused persons who are said to have involved in the murder of Praveen Nettaru on 26.07.2022 at Putturu. FIR was registered in Crime No. 63/2022 by the local police station, and then the investigation was handed over to the NIA. Appellant came into picture when supplementary charge sheet was filed against him and accused No.25 invoking the offences punishable under Sections 120B and 212 of IPC and Section 19 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (for short ‘ UAPA ’).
4. Sri Mohammed Tahir, learned counsel for the appellant, assails the order of the Special Court urging the following grounds :
(ii) The appellant had no knowledge that accused N
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
