Back
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
ANU SIVARAMAN, K. MANMADHA RAO, JJ
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY – Appellant
Versus
M/S. SIDDHARTH INFOTECH PVT. LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. implementation of ict scheme and agreement. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. findings of the arbitrator. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. appellate court's findings on arbitrator's award. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. appellant's arguments against maintainability and privity. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. importance of necessary parties in arbitral proceedings. (Para 42) |
| 6. conclusion on appeal regarding the award. (Para 43 , 44) |
CAV JUDGMENT
The current commercial appeal has been filed by the Appellants being aggrieved by the concurrent findings passed by the Hon’ble Arbitrator vide award dated 18.05.2022 and the judgment in challenge to the arbitration award under Section 34 of ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 , dated 31.07.2023, in Com.A.P.No.79/2022 on the file of LXXXII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH.83) (herein after referred to as ‘the Commercial Court’ for short).
2. The State Government decided to implement the Scheme of Government of India, known as Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), which was to cover 4396 schools and the total cost was Rs. 412 Crores. Accordingly, it was decided that the Department of Educational Research and Training (DSERT) would be implemen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
