SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Kar) 9101

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.G.S. KAMAL
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Appellant
Versus
S JAYAKUMAR – Respondent


ORAL JUDGMENT

This appeal is by the State represented by Lokayukta Police, being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 17.06.2013 passed in Special Case no.158/2009 on the file of the District and Sessions Judge at Chamarajanagar, by which the Trial Court had acquitted the respondent - accused for the offences punishable under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('Act', for brevity).

2. Brief facts of the case of the prosecution are that the complainant, P.W.1, namely, A.V.Channiyappan had apparently approached the respondent - accused, who was a Taluk Surveyor, then working in the Survey Department in the Office of the Tahsildar, Gundlupet, requesting him to have his land measuring 3 acres 28 guntas bearing Sy.No.23/2 situated at Managalli village, Gundlupete Taluk, surveyed and to have the encroachment by the neighbours removed enabling him to have the ingress and aggress and to carry his agricultural produce. That the accused went on postponing the same. Finally the accused had informed him that it was difficult to have the land surveyed as the neighbours would create galata and had instructed the complainant to seek police he

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top