SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 6509

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
BINU.D – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
J.R.PREM NAVAZ, PREETHA RANI M.S., SUMEEN S., MUHAMMED SWADIQ M.R.ALPHY GEORGE O.MOHAMED BASIL KOYA THANGAL

O R D E R

This Bail Application is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

2. Petitioner is the sole accused in Crime No.99 of 2025 of Vattappara Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram. The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Sections 74 , 115(2), 296(b), 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short ‘ BNS ’).

3. The prosecution case is that the petitioner, who is a member of Vettinad Ward, due to the animosity that the defacto complainant refused to remove the plants placed in front of her nursery namely “Ethen Garden”, on 31.01.2025 at about 10:30 a.m., the accused came to her nursery and after uttering obscene words slapped her left cheek and kicked her after causing mischief by destroying the plants worth Rs.25,000/-. Hence, it is alleged that the accused committed the offence.

4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor.

5. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the only non-bailable offence alleged is under Section 74 of BNS . The counsel submitted that even if the entire allegations are accepted, the ingredients of Section 74 of is not attracted. The counsel submitted that the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top