SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KER) 4375

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
HARIS R. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
P.K.NIJOY, C.PRABITHA, REJOICE B.CHEMBAKASSERIL, R.SUNIL KUMAR, A.SALINI LAL, JINU P. BINU

O R D E R

These Bail Applications are filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

2. These Bail Applications are connected and therefore, I am disposing of these bail applications by a common order. The petitioners are accused in crime No. 821/2024 of Pallickal Police Station. The above case is registered against the petitioners alleging offences punishable under Secs. 296(b), 329(4), 115(2), 74, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023 (for short ' BNS ')

3. The prosecution case is that on 10.11.2024,at

8.25 pm, the petitioner and his friend came to the ice plant and attacked the complainant and her husband.

4. Heard counsel for the petitioner and the Public Prosecutor. I also heard the learned counsel appearing for the defacto complainant.

5. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that the only non-bailable offence is under Sec. 74 of the BNS . The counsel submitted that even if the entire allegations are accepted, Sec.74 of the is not attracted. The counsel appearing for the defacto complainant submitted that the petitioners attacked the defacto complainant and the defacto complainant sustained serious injuries. The counsel submitted that if this Court rele

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top