IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J
SREE KANJIRAMATTOM MAHADEVA TEMPLE BHARANA SAMITHI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners claim property exemption under klr act. (Para 1) |
| 2. court's analysis of property rights and exemptions. (Para 3 , 7 , 13 , 15) |
| 3. arguments against petitioners' legal standing and claims. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. established legal principles regarding temple property protection. (Para 6 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 5. writ petition disposed; petitioners to appeal. (Para 16) |
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The 1st petitioner is the Bharana Samithi of Sree Kanjiramattom Mahadeva Temple, the 2nd petitioner is the deity of that temple, represented by a devotee, and the 3rd petitioner is a member of Medanganal Mana, which is stated to have the ooralan/ooranma right of that temple. The petitioners have filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, contending that the property having an extent of 3.69 Acres in Survey No.283/6 of the Todupuzha Village, which belongs to the deity of Sree Kanjiramattom Mahadeva Temple is a land exempted from the provisions of the Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1963 , in view of the provisions under Section 3 (1)(x) of that Act over which the Land Tribunal has no jurisdiction and consequently Exts.P5 to P8 purchase certificates iss
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.