Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, J
The petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Travancore Devaswom Board – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for mandamus on appeal consideration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. devaswom property protection and management. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's duty to safeguard religious property. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. jurisdiction of high court in land disputes. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. interpretation of devaswom properties under law. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. details of land ownership and encroachment case. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
Anil K. Narendran, J.
The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of mandamus commanding the 2nd respondent Revenue Divisional Officer to consider and pass a speaking order on Ext.P5 appeal, which is one filed invoking the provisions under Section 16 of the Kerala Land Conservancy Act , 1957, challenging Ext.P4 order dated 25.10.2023 of the 5th respondent Special Tahsildar (Land Conservancy), Travancore Devaswom Board. The petitioner has also sought for a similar relief in respect of Ext.P6 stay petition filed along with Ext.P5 appeal.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Senior Government Pleader for respondents 1 to 3 and also the learned Standing Counsel for Travancore Devaswo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
