HIGH COURT OF KERALA
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
T.M. BIJU – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the lease and ownership of the property. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties regarding the lease. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's analysis of the parties' arguments and legal principles. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. court's reasoning on the applicability of section 116 of the transfer of property act. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. final judgment ordering eviction and dismissal of the second writ petition. (Para 23) |
JUDGMENT
[W.P(C) Nos.39962/2017 and 38439/2018]
These writ petitions pertain to a retail outlet of the Indian Oil Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as the “respondent Corporation”) in the property leased out by the petitioners in W.P(C) No.38439 of 2018 and run by the petitioner in W.P(C) No.39962 of 2017, pursuant to an allotment by the respondent Corporation.
2. The short facts necessary for the disposal of these writ petitions are as follows:
The petitioners in W.P(C) No.38439 of 2018 are stated to be in joint ownership of about 35.20 Ares of property in Re- Survey No.104/2 in Kuthuparamba Village in Kannur District. Out of the afore property, the petitioners leased out 30 cents to M/s.IBP
Abraham Varghese v. Kerala State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited
Central Bank of India v. Beena Thiruvenkitam
Moosakutty Haji K.P. v. CSI Ascension Church, Kottayam and Others
General Manager, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Radhika Chettri
Shanti Prasad Devi and Another v. Shankar Mahto and others
Sarup Singh Gupta v. S.Jagdish Singh and Others
Delhi Development Authority v. Anant Raj Agencies Private Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.