R.NARAYANA PISHARADI, J.

1. The first appellant is a nationalised bank. The second appellant is the Assistant General Manager of the bank. The bank is the tenant of the building owned by the respondent.

2. The respondent filed W.P.(C) No.17866/2017 against the appellants seeking the following reliefs:

“(i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to surrender vacant possession of the petitioner's premises covered by Exhibit P-1 lease deed, within a reasonable period of time;

(ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the Chairman and Managing Director to the respondents to consider Exhibit P-14 representation and pass appropriate orders on it in accordance with law and the policy of the respondents, after affording the petitioner an opportunity of being heard;

(iii) Issue such other directions that this Honourable Court may deem fit and expedient, to meet the ends of justice, in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. The learned Single Judge disposed of the writ petition by directing the bank to surrender vacant possession of the building occupied by it to the resp