Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.B.SURESH KUMAR, P.G. AJITHKUMAR, JJ
SUBEESH – Appellant
Versus
VICHATHRAN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding denial of opportunity for payment. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. observations regarding tenant's obligations under the act. (Para 8 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. final ruling on the tenant’s obligations. (Para 16) |
| 5. considerations for execution and time for removal. (Para 17 , 18) |
P.G.Ajithkumar, J.
The respondent in R.C.P No.24 of 2016 before the Rent Control Court (Munsiff), North Paravur is the revision petitioner. Rent Control Court, as per order dated 29.03.2021, stopped further proceedings in the R.C.P under Section 12 (3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 and directed the petitioner-tenant to surrender vacant possession of the petition schedule room to the respondent- landlord. The petitioner preferred an appeal as R.C.A No.7 of 2021 under Section 18 of the Act before the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Additional District Judge, North Paravur), but it was unsuccessful. Hence, he filed this revision petition under Section 20 of the Act.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in detail.
3. The respondent filed R.C.P No.24 of 2016 for e
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
