Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, J, SHAJI P.CHALY, J
DR. VIKAS R S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. weightage claims based on rural service were legally challenged. (Para 1 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. state's authority in regulating educational quotas affirmed. (Para 16 , 17 , 20) |
| 3. prospectus provisions upheld for public interest. (Para 18 , 21 , 27) |
| 4. regulation 9(iv) does not confer statutory entitlements. (Para 19 , 23 , 29) |
| 5. final ruling dismissed all appeals. (Para 34) |
JUDGMENT
Shaji P. Chaly, J.
The captioned writ appeals are filed by petitioners in W. P. (C) Nos. 2838 of 2022 and 2161 of 2022 challenging the judgments of the learned Single Judge dated 03.02.2022 and 31.01.2022 respectively, whereby the writ petitions were dismissed declaring that the proviso under Regulation 9(IV) of the Medical Council of India Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 does not confer a right on Medical Officers under the service of Government / public authorities to get weightage in the marks as incentive for service in remote and/or difficult rural areas for the purpose of admission to post graduate medical courses; and further held that Ext. P7 Government Order dated 15.01.2022 of the Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Kerala and the prospectus attached to the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
