SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 24566

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, J, SHAJI P.CHALY, J
DR. VIKAS R S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WA NO. 219 OF 2022 | WA NO. 233 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ELVIN PETER P.J., K.R.GANESH, GOURI BALAGOPAL, ABHIJITH.K.ANIRUDHAN, SREELEKSHMI A.S.
For the Respondents: SRI.P.G.PRAMOD

State regulations regarding post-graduate medical course admissions supersede national standards, and weightage for rural service is not a statutory right.

Headnote:(A) Medical Council of India Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 - Regulation 9(IV) - Writ appeals challenging the denial of weightage in marks for service in difficult or remote rural areas in admission to PG medical courses - Held, the proviso does not confer a right for weightage in marks to Medical Officers under Government service - State has the authority to determine the specifics of service quotas and incentives. (Paras 1-34)

(B) Eligibility and Reservation - The Special provisions made by State in the prospectus for PG admission are valid and within legislative competence, ensuring merit remains a priority. (Paras 16-19)

Facts of the case:
The appellants, working as Assistant Surgeons in rural areas, sought admission benefits in PG courses on grounds of service, challenging clauses in the prospectus for the year 2021-2022, and claiming the need for higher weightage for service in rural areas.

Findings of Court:
The Court upheld that the State's prospectus provisions on service weightage maintained both public interest and meritocracy, rejecting claims for retroactive benefits or higher incentives not included in the current prospectus.

Issues: The primary legal questions included the validity of service weightage provisions in the context of the Medical Council Regulations and the authority of the State to regulate admissions.

Ratio Decidendi: Regulation 9(IV) is merely enabling and does not afford a statutory entitlement; the State is empowered to legislate on educational quotas based on public requirements, and judicial respect must be given to such policy decisions made in the public interest.

Result: Appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. weightage claims based on rural service were legally challenged. (Para 1 , 4 , 6)
2. state's authority in regulating educational quotas affirmed. (Para 16 , 17 , 20)
3. prospectus provisions upheld for public interest. (Para 18 , 21 , 27)
4. regulation 9(iv) does not confer statutory entitlements. (Para 19 , 23 , 29)
5. final ruling dismissed all appeals. (Para 34)

JUDGMENT

Shaji P. Chaly, J.

The captioned writ appeals are filed by petitioners in W. P. (C) Nos. 2838 of 2022 and 2161 of 2022 challenging the judgments of the learned Single Judge dated 03.02.2022 and 31.01.2022 respectively, whereby the writ petitions were dismissed declaring that the proviso under Regulation 9(IV) of the Medical Council of India Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 does not confer a right on Medical Officers under the service of Government / public authorities to get weightage in the marks as incentive for service in remote and/or difficult rural areas for the purpose of admission to post graduate medical courses; and further held that Ext. P7 Government Order dated 15.01.2022 of the Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Kerala and the prospectus attached to the Government Order supersede Ext. P4 Government Order dated 12.04.2018 of the same department.

2. The facts required for the disposal of the writ appeals discernible from W. A. No. 233 of 2022 are relied upon:-

3. The 1st appellant is working as Assistant Surgeon in the Primary Health Centre, Moothedam, Malappuram District, a difficult rural area. The appellant entered service on 27.04.2017. The 2nd appellant is working as Assistant Surgeon in the Community Health Centre, Thycattusery, Cherthala, which is a rural area; who entered service on 10.01.2017. It is submitted by the appellants that the 1st appellant has difficult rural area service and the second appellant has rural area service to their credit.

4. The appellants have participated in the National Eligibility- cum-Entrance Test (NEET) PG – 2021 and they have secured rank No. 40151 and 22849 respectively. According to the appellants, since they are Government employees, they are entitled to get the benefit of service quota for Medical PG (MD) admission in the colleges in Kerala as per clause 6 of Ext. P9 prospectus issued by the State Government for admission to Medical Post Graduate Degree Courses 2021-2022 issued as per a Government Order dated 15.01.2022.

5. It is further submitted that as per clause 9 (1) of the Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000, the students for PG Medical Courses shall be selected strictly on the basis of their academic merit. The appellants have also challenged clause 6.6.12 of the prospectus to the extent it states that 'the total service will be reckoned as on the date of notification for inviting application by CEE for admission to the courses'.

6. The grievance in respect of Ext. P9 prospectus raised by the appellants are (i) total service will be reckoned for admission to Post Graduate Courses which is violative of the parent Regulations and the ratio of the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Sudheer N. v. State of Kerala and Others [ (2015) 6 SCC 685 ]; (ii) Doctors working in rural area is given an incentive of only 2 percent of marks obtained for each year in service in rural areas and Doctors working in difficult rural area is given an incentive of only 5 percent marks obtained for each year of service in difficult rural areas, which is unjust, illegal and arbitrary, since a higher weightage of at least 10 percent is to be given for both rural and difficult rural area service; (iii) No special reservation is given to Doctors working in rural area and/or difficult remote area, in spite of the prescription in the parent Regulations as regarding Diploma seats and since there are no Diploma seats in the State of Kerala, the reservation must be given for PG Degree seats and (iv) splitting up of in-service quota in medical education service quota, heal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top