HIGH COURT OF KERALA
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN, J
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER – Appellant
Versus
CHANDRIKA.K – Respondent
ORDER
This Review Petition is preferred seeking review of the judgment dated
20.01.2020 in W.P.(C) No.30210 of 2019.
2. I have heard Sri. S.Prasanth, the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner and Sri. M.Gopikrishnan Nambiar, the learned Standing Counsel.
3. It is by now settled that review of a judgment is permitted only when it is shown that the judgment suffers from any error apparent on the face of the record.
4. The contention advanced by the petitioner while seeking review of the judgment, is that though the challenge raised by the EPFO to the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Sasikumar P. V. Union of India and Ors1. was repelled by the Apex Court in SLP(C) No.8658-8659 of 2019, a review petition filed against the judgment was entertained by the Apex Court and the same is pending. It is also submitted that the Central Government has also preferred an appeal and the same is pending. It is further submitted that their Lordships of the Division Bench in the judgment dated 21.12.2020 in W.A.No.944/2020 had expressed doubts about the
correctness of Sasikumar (supra). According to the petitioner, as this Court in the judgment under Review
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.