Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALEE KRISHNA S., ANIL K.NARENDRAN
M.D. Esthappan – Appellant
Versus
Reserve Bank Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties involved and their proceedings (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. writ petition challenge and relief sought (Para 3) |
| 3. details of reliefs and contentions (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. court's observations on contentions and law (Para 5 , 10 , 21) |
| 5. petitioners' contentions and responsibilities (Para 9 , 32) |
| 6. ratio decidendi regarding msme status (Para 20 , 23) |
| 7. outcome of the case (Para 34) |
JUDGMENT :
These writ appeals filed under Section 5 (i) of the Kerala High Court Act , 1958, arise out of the common judgment dated 11.03.2025 of the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)Nos.45166 of 2024 and 46514 of 2024. The 1st appellant in W.A.No.481 of 2025, arising out of W.P.(C)No.45166 of 2024, is M/s.M.D. Esthappan, a sole proprietorship concern, and the 2nd appellant M.D. Esthappan is the sole proprietor of the said concern. The 1st appellant in W.A.No.484 of 2025, arising out of W.P.(C)No.46514 of 2024, is M/s.M.D. Esthappan Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and the 2nd appellant M.D. Esthappan is the Managing Director of the said company.
(a) To declare that the failure on the part of the Central Government/RBI to implement the MSMED notification dated
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
