Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
SYAM KUMAR V.M., J
ABDUL RAHMAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. incident leading to the claim of compensation. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments on the deceased's bonafides and ticket validity. (Para 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's clarification on ticket validity and presumption of bona fide. (Para 9) |
| 4. final ruling on compensation amount due. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 01st day of July, 2025 This appeal is filed challenging the judgment dated 19.09.2012 in OA. (II u)/ERS/2012/0038 of the Railway Claims Tribunal (RCT), Ernakulam Bench. Appellants were the applicants before the RCT. Respondent was the respondent therein. Parties are referred to according to their status before the RCT. 2. Applicant's case in brief is as follows:
Aydru @ Basheer had gone to Pattambi in search of employment, and on his way back, he visited his mother's house at Ottapalam. In the evening, while returning from Pattambi to Lakkidi along with his friend in Mangalore Coimbatore passenger train, when the train left Ottapalam Railway Station, he accidentally fell down from the train and got seriously injured. He later died in the Government Hospital, Ottapalam. The deceased was working as a coolie and was the sole breadwinner of his family, which consisted of his ag
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
