Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B.SNEHALATHA
Linu J. Varghese, S/o. A.J. Varghese – Appellant
Versus
Aacquiline Linu Varghese, D/o. Linu J. Varghese – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grounds for maintenance and marriage expenses (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. appellant's financial capacity challenged; claims of incapacity (Para 5 , 6 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. minor's entitlement to maintenance before petition (Para 7 , 12) |
| 4. evidence evaluation process in family court (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. consideration of inheritance and its implications (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. court's reasoning on maintenance and marriage expense amounts (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 7. modification of family court's orders and conclusions (Para 23) |
JUDGMENT :
The appellant is the father of the respondent and he assails the judgment of the learned Family Court, Kollam, in OP (Others) No.1477/2017 dated 30.08.2022.
3. The respondent was only about 13 years old at the time when the Original Petition was filed and we are told that she is today a woman of 21 years in age.
5. Smt.K.Latha – appearing for the appellant, argued that the learned Family Court has fixed the afore figures without taking into account the factum of her client suffering from impecuniousness because, his monthly income from a daily wage employment he has with the Fisheries is only to a sum of Rs.10,000/- per month, as evident from
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
