Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN
C.A.Sasi – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. criminal appeal jurisdiction and structure (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. charges of misappropriation under pc act and ipc (Para 3) |
| 3. overview of trial process and evidence (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. defense arguments highlighting accused's leave (Para 6) |
| 5. prosecution's rebuttal on accountability (Para 7) |
| 6. evaluating key points of contention (Para 8) |
| 7. legal analysis under ipc and intent (Para 9 , 18 , 28) |
| 8. evidence from witnesses regarding cash handling (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 9. dw testimonies challenging prosecution's claims (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 10. ingredients for proving misappropriation and falsification (Para 19 , 24 , 29) |
| 11. final judgment and sentencing rationale (Para 30) |
JUDGMENT :
This criminal appeal has been filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’ for short) by the sole accused in C.C.No.13/2005 on the files of the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Thiruvananthapuram, challenging the verdict of conviction and sentence dated 01.12.2012 in the above case.
3. In this matter, the prosecution alleges commission of offences punishable under Section 13 (2) r/w Section 13 (1)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act , 1988
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
