Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN
K. Sreenivasan – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and charges. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. court's analysis on evidence and valuations. (Para 2 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments on property valuation and discharge. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 4. final order and directions from the court. (Para 10) |
ORDER :
2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the CBI in detail. Perused the documents.
4. The 5th accused moved discharge petition before the Special Court, mainly urging that he did not overvalue the property and he had valued the property and shown the actual value and he did not participate in the conspiracy as alleged. In paragraph No.18 of the impugned order, the learned Special Judge discussed the contention of the 5th accused and negatived the same, while disallowing the discharge, which reads as under:
5. The learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner/5th accused vehemently contended that merely for the purpose of undervaluing a property, when compared with another valuation report obtained subsequently, if such subsequent reports are not based on any scientific or legally recognized method, the same would not, by itself, constitute a valid r
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
