Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A.BADHARUDEEN
K. Sreenivasan – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and charges. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. court's analysis on evidence and valuations. (Para 2 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments on property valuation and discharge. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 4. final order and directions from the court. (Para 10) |
ORDER :
The 5th accused in C.C.No.7/2011, pending before the Special Court (SPE/CBI), Thiruvananthapuram, has filed this criminal revision petition under Sections 397 and 402 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘ Cr.P.C .’ for short), challenging order in Crl.M.P.No.4/2022 dated 22.01.2022, along with Crl.M.P.No.20/2011 passed by the learned Special Judge, thereby the plea of discharge at the option of the revision petitioner was dismissed.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner and the learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the CBI in detail. Perused the documents.
3. In this matter, the prosecution case is that, during the period between March, 2006 and August, 2006, accused Nos.1 to 5, hatched conspiracy to cheat the State Bank of India, ADB Branch, Cullan Road, Allappuzha. Pursuant to the conspiracy, accused Nos.3 and 4 approached the land owners who were in debt but having
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
