JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:

“i) Call for the records pertaining to Ext.P14 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari.

ii) Issue a of writ of mandamus or appropriate direction to the 1st respondent to reconsider the Ext.P11 application of the petitioner by considering Ext.P2 to Ext.P4 and remove the entry of petitioner’s property from data Bank within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble court.

iii) dispense with filing of the translation of documents in Malayalam produced in the above writ petition.

iv) pass such other writs, orders or directions as this Hon'ble Court may deems just, fit and necessary in the facts and circumstances of this case.

And v) Allow the writ petition writ petition with cost” [SIC]

2. The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P14 order passed by the 1^st respondent rejecting Ext.P11 Form–5 application submitted by the petitioner under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioner is that the authorised officer has not considered the contentions of the petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. T