Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
AKHILA SAJITH – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition requests to quash and reconsider form-5 application. (Para 1) |
| 2. petitioner claims officer did not comply with statutory guidelines. (Para 2) |
| 3. court found impugned order lacked proper assessment as per law. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“I. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order calling for the records leading to Exhibit P5 and quash Exhibit P5 order.
II. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order removing the land covered by Exhibit P1 land tax receipt from the Exhibit P4 Data Bank. Or in the alternative, direct the 2nd respondent to consider application afresh and pass an appropriate order within a time frame that may be fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
III. Pass an appropriate order dispensing with the translation of the vernacular documents produced in the Memorandum of Writ Petition and accepting the same.
IV. Issue such other writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the light of the facts and circumstances of the case so as to secure the ends of justice.”[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 2nd responde
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
