Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S.TH, JJ
M/S PRAJITH BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND CHIEF MANAGER KERALA GRAMIN BANK – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and parties involved. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments regarding the diligence in prosecuting the case and the rationale for condonation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on the need for considering the merits of the case for delay condonation. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal standards and principles governing the review jurisdiction and criteria for condonation of delay. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 5. final dismissal of the review petition. (Para 32) |
ORDER
Muralee Krishna, J.
Respondents 1 and 2 in W.A. No. 2323 of 2025 filed this review petition under Order XLVII Rule 1, read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908, (‘CPC’, for short), pleading that there is a mistake or error apparent on the face of the record in the order dated 11.11.2025 passed by this Court in C.M. Application No.1 of 2025, which was an application filed by the 1st respondent herein-appellant to condone the delay of 357 days in filing the appeal.
2. Heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, and the learned counsel for the 1st respondent.
3. The learned Senior Counsel su
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
