Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MOHAN.S. – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to challenge a decision regarding land conservation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court hears arguments from both parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. court analyzes and critiques the decision made by the authorized officer. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“I. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to set aside the Exhibit P1 order. II. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to remove the petitioner’s 20.75 Ares of property in Re Survey No. 250/18 in Malayinkeezhu Village from the data bank.
III. Translation of vernacular documents produced as exhibits in this case may be dispensed with as the same will be produced as and when directed by this Hon'ble Court;
and IV. Grant such other reliefs which are appropriate and incidental to this proceeding and which this Honourable Court deems fit and proper.”[SIC]
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order passed by the 1st respondent rejecting the Form–5 application submitted by the petitioner under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioner
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
