IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
PRAVEEN DAMODARAN – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISION OFFICER – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“(i) issue a writ of certiorari or any appropriate writ, order or direction calling for the records leading to Exhibit.P5 order and quash the same;
(ii) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the 1st respondent to re-consider and dispose of Exhibit.P3 application and direct to correct the Data Bank of Eloor Municipality and make necessary corrections in the data bank by deleting the land comprised in Re. Sy. No.100 in Block No. 151 of Eloor village owned by the petitioners;
(iii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of this case including the cost of this Writ Petition;
(iv) Dispense with translation of the documents produced along with the writ petition.”[SIC]
2. The petitioners are aggrieved by Ext.P5 order passed by the 1st respondent rejecting Ext.P3 Form–5 application submitted by them under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules , 2008 (‘Rules’, for brevity). The main grievance of the petitioners is that the authorised officer has not considered the contentions of the petitioners.
3. Heard the learn
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.