Back
KERALA HIGH COURT
, J
Thalassery Co-op. Rural Bank Ltd. v. State of Kerala and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. chronology and procedural history of the case outlined. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. further procedural complications and remands within the case discussed. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 3. petitioner bank's arguments regarding revision delay and procedural compliance presented. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. third respondent's challenge to petitioner's claims analyzed. (Para 22 , 23 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. discussion on a reasonable time frame for filing revisions highlighted. (Para 30 , 31 , 36 , 41) |
| 6. court affirms it has jurisdiction to hear merits, despite existing delays. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 42 , 43) |
| 7. final decisions on the legality of disciplinary actions and implications for the third respondent. (Para 51 , 54 , 55) |
1. The devil is in detail: thus goes the idiom. The fact of the present case is that the devil of delay is in the detail of chronology—the proceedings having begun in 1984, the lis refuses to die down even after thirty years.
2. In 1984, the third respondent was charged with dereliction of duty; in 1985, a punishment of reversion was imposed; the quasi - judicial proceedings dragged on and still drag on though the third respondent retired
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
