Antony Dominic, J.

1. This appeal is filed by the sixth respondent in the Writ Petition. By the impugned judgment, the learned single Judge had quashed Exts.P5, P6 and P7 on the ground that the power of revision available to the Government under R.93 of Chapter XIV A of Kerala Education Rules (hereinafter referred to as "K.E.R.") was only in respect of original orders. It is aggrieved by the said judgment that the appellant has come up in appeal. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as they are arrayed in the Original Petition.

2. Before we deal with the controversy, requiring to be resolved, we may notice the facts which are necessary for the disposal of the appeal.

3. The sixth respondent in the Writ Petition was appointed in a leave vacancy of H.S.A. (Maths) for the period from 6.10.1997 to 11.12.1997 in the V.P. Oriental High School, Chokli of which the fifth respondent is the Manager. The appointment was also approved by the Educational Authorities. Being a claimant under Rule 51A of Chapter XIV A of K.E.R., he was appointed in a permanent vacancy of H.S.A.(Maths) with effect from 1.6.1998, in a retirement vacancy that arose on 31.3.1998. In Ext.P8 dated