K.T.THOMAS, S.N.VARIAVA
Roshan Deen – Appellant
Versus
Preeti Lal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Thomas, J.-Leave granted.
2. If the Judgment of the High Court, now under attack, is termed as wrong and untenable it is only a euphemistic characterisation. It really amounted to crippling the cause of justice of a crippled man. The powers of writ jurisdiction of the High Courts are basically intended to salvage causes of justice, but the High Court, in this case, has exercised such powers for over-turning justice which a lower authority had granted to a devastatingly disabled person.
3. Roshan Deen, a young man of 25, made a claim on the respondent (who was running a Flour Mill-cum-Sugarcane Factory) for a sum of Rs. 7 lakhs on the following factual averments : The claimant (present appellant) was a workman of the respondent s industrial establishment, on a monthly salary of Rs. 1500/-. On an ill-fated day in his life (4.3.1995) he was operating a machine of the Mill, but in a sudden tweak he got himself snapped in the shaft of a column and was crushed by the fast rotating machine and was ruinously injured. His neck, hands, legs etc. suffered multiple injuries including fractures. He was rushed to a private hospital and from there, to the Post Graduate Institute, Chandigarh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.