ANEETA YESUDAS vs CHAIRMAN APPEAL COMMITTEE, SUB DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 56329

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
ANEETA YESUDAS – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN APPEAL COMMITTEE, SUB DISTRICT SCHOOL KALOLSAVAM – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.APARNA C.MENON
For the Respondents: SRI. P.S. APPU

Table of Content
1. petitioner secured 3rd position in a competition but was dissatisfied with results. (Para 1)
2. arguments revolve around procedural flaws in appeal rejection. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court emphasizes limitations on intervention in internal committee decisions. (Para 4 , 5)
4. writ petition dismissed due to lack of substantial procedural errors. (Para 6)

J UDGMENT

The petitioner competed in the News Reading Competition at the Kerala Social Science Fair HSS/VSS held in the Alappuzha Sub- District Sasthrolsavam and secured 3^rd position. Dissatisfied with the result, the petitioner preferred appeal, which the appeal committee rejected as per Ext.P4. Hence this writ petition.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appeal was initially dismissed on the premise that the petitioner had secured only the 5^th position and on the mistake being pointed out, Ext.P4 order was passed on the premise that the petitioner had secured 13 marks less than the contestant in the 2^nd position. It is contended that, contrary to the Manual stipulating the guidelines for conduct of Sasthrolsavam, the score sheet was corrected and the remarks column left blank. The appeal was rejected with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document