IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
C K THOMAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner challenges decision on paddy land classification. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court hears counsel for both parties. (Para 3) |
| 3. court finds authorized officer's failure to properly assess land. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:
“i) Call for the records leading to Ext.P3 dated 13.8.2024 and quash the same by issuing a writ of certiorari finding that it is illegal.
ii) issue a writ of mandamus or other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the 2nd respondent/ Authorized Officer to reconsider and pass orders on Ext.P2 in Form 5 application dehors the finding in Ext.P3 order after affording an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner, within a time limit fixed by this Hon’ble Court.
iii) Declare that the property of the petitioner lying in 3.71 Ares of land lying in Sy.No.6/23 of Thekkumbhagom Village in Kanayannur Taluk in Block No. 345 Ernakulam District is not a paddy land and is liable to be excluded from the data bank.
iv) Dispense with filing of translation of vernacular documents.
v) issue such other appropriate writ, order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit in the circumstances of the case ”[SIC
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.