Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A.TH, J
CHEVRON BUILDERS & REALTORS (P) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
VIJAYASEKHARAN PILLAI.K.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion of the complaints and claims by petitioners. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding consumer status and legal obligations. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court review of the obligations and jurisdiction challenges. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's analysis of relevant case law and jurisdiction. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. conclusion regarding jurisdiction and dismissal of writ petitions. (Para 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
In both these cases, the petitioners are the opposite parties before the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram. W.P.(C.) No. 23801 of 2025 is filed against the order passed in C.C. No.104/2016 pending before the State Commission, whereas W.P.(c.) No. 24255 of 2025, was submitted against the order passed in C.C. No. 105/2016 of the State Commission.
2. The facts in both the above complaints are similar. The 1st respondent in both the writ petitions, were shareholders of the 1st petitioner company. Later, a decision has been taken by the Board of Directors of the company, as evidenced by Ext.P11, by which, the 1st respondent in both the cases were permitted to transfer the shares, and in consideration for transferring the shares and taking into account the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
