JUDGMENT

In both these cases, the petitioners are the opposite parties before the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission, Thiruvananthapuram. W.P.(C.) No. 23801 of 2025 is filed against the order passed in C.C. No.104/2016 pending before the State Commission, whereas W.P.(c.) No. 24255 of 2025, was submitted against the order passed in C.C. No. 105/2016 of the State Commission.

2. The facts in both the above complaints are similar. The 1st respondent in both the writ petitions, were shareholders of the 1st petitioner company. Later, a decision has been taken by the Board of Directors of the company, as evidenced by Ext.P11, by which, the 1st respondent in both the cases were permitted to transfer the shares, and in consideration for transferring the shares and taking into account the long and invaluable services rendered by them in the company, it was decided that the company would construct and hand over, apartments to the said parties, in their project named “Chevron Celestine Orbit” in Chittazha within 18 months from 01.07.2013. Apart from the above, Rupees three lakhs amount was also to be paid to the 1st respondent in W.P.(c.) No.23801 of 2025. In furtherance of the underst